Christmas Quizzing!

We had a great night out with friends & neighbours at the annual Christmas 🎅 Quiz !
Thanks again to Brian & Steve for organising the event and raising funds for the association.

Lincolnshire Highways : Temporary road closure Mount Pleasant/Mount Pleasant Ave

TEMPORARY ROAD CLOSURE: Louth
Please note it will be necessary to impose a temporary restriction to all vehicular traffic on the road(s) detailed below. Adequate arrangements will be made to enable pedestrians to access premises in the affected area while works progress.
REASON FOR CLOSURE: Carriageway patching & footway reconstruction works
LOCATION: Mount Pleasant/Mount Pleasant Avenue
PERIOD OF CLOSURE: 15/12/2014 to 16/1/2014
(Closures to be implemented for up to 5 days as & when required during this period, signage detailing accurate dates & times will be displayed on site in advance)
ALTERNATIVE ROUTE: N/A. No through road

Table Top sale

 We had a successful Table Top Sale on the 4th October, raising funds for the association and helping the local residents to buy and sell lots of interesting items!

Thanks to everyone who helped make it such a success ...We're planning another event for 2015 so watch this space!

Objection to 82 Mount Pleasant proposal

As agreed at the previous meeting, here is a copy of the objection I have just registered on behalf of the Residents' Association

"On behalf of the Pleasant Residents' Association I wish to make clear our concerns with the proposed development at 82 Mount Pleasant.
 Apart from the loss of amenity to residents on both Mount Pleasant and Spire View Road by this large development caused by the increased traffic flow on adopted and unadopted roads.
A major concern is the impact that the site will have on the serious flooding problems within our town. At the moment the site is predominately bare soil, building over this area without providing an adequate infiltration system to replicate the existing capacity of the land to absorb surface water is a serious error and one that will have an impact on the lives of many Louth residents. 

The flood risk assessment supplied by the developers states that an infiltration system would not be viable. If that is the case then surely that is enough evidence to ensure that this proposal does not go ahead. The flood risk assessment states that the current mean annual run off rate is 5.8l/s, but that is for a site that is already positively drained. It seems unlikely that the existing land is positively drained and more likely that the land already absorbs and retains most of the current rainfall. So the 5.8l/s is an additional load to the system and not a current equivalent. Attenuating the flow to prevent additional pressure to the already over burdened surface water drains seems like a desperate measure to do something to appease the genuine concerns about the flooding issue for our town. 
Who is responsible for keeping the pumping station maintained in perpetuity ? What happens to the pump in the event of a power cut? There are many risks to this proposal which if agreed will have a lasting negative affect on local residents. Please reject this application."

I understand that Councillor Horton has called in this application, if you wish to speak for or against the proposals please remember to register your intention to speak 48 hrs before the date of the meeting (yet to be confirmed).

Welcome to "The Perch"

Thanks to funds from Louth Town Council we managed to refurbish the much used bench on Little Lane in time for the East Midland In Bloom Judges visit on the 17th July.

We hope you like it..it's supposed to look like a fishes mouth (i.e. the perch) though we've had many other interpretations from frogs to pacman!

Please leave a comment , we'd love to hear your views!

Pleasant Residents Association

Minutes of meeting 12^th March 2014

Present:  Brian Shaw, Sylvia Scott, Dave Heal, Eileen Howard, Brenda Nutt, Sandy Trafford, Di Dray, Gary Dray, Betty Pinfold, Keith Scott, Neal Overton and Patrick Purves.

Apologies:  James Pocklington, Liz Beadle

·        Minutes of the last meeting read and agreed

·         Arising

·         Patrick reported on the long letter from County Council legal Dept, about Watts Lane. Apparently it may have been a public right of way prior to the Reformation.  Brian would try to contact Judith Hall, an enthusiast of local history.  We would respond after that one.

·         Volunteers for marshalling on Watts Lane were Brian Shaw, Gary Dray and Patrick Purves.  A bigger team might be a good thing.  They  would need digital cameras and notebooks and high-visibility tabards.

·         Little Lane potholes had been patched.  Dave Heal reported the road was still scheduled for resurfacing.  The impact on Watts Lane would need to be considered

·         Eileen commented on the state of Mount Pleasant Avenue and dog mess on the playing field approaches.

·         Brian had booked an entertainer for the Christmas party which is on Saturday 20^th December at 3.00 p.m.  He mentioned gas bulk-buying, and the neighbour struggling with a work permit – our MP had declined to assist.

·         Keith Scott raised the odd issue of plastic windows on Church Street,.  Some properties had them, but others (including his mother’s house) had had them refused.  The Conservation Area was being enforced inconsistently, it seemed.

·         Gary Dray made some observations on a planning decision concerning a door, and Brian mentioned his.

·         The recent swimming gala at the Sports Centre had resulted in much parking on-street, despite an overflow car park which had been largely empty.

·         Eileen mentioned she had raised £900 for Charity and thanked all those who had supported her following Eric’s decease.

·         There being no other business the meeting closed at 8:40 p.m.

Speed management review

This is a copy of an email I sent to Louise Tyers, Scrutiny Officer LCC on 27th February 2014

...................................................................................

Hi Louise,

On behalf of our residents association I would like to state our support for an introduction

of enforceable 20 mph speed limits on residential streets and town centres.

 

It's difficult to see what the downside is to this. 

•    There has been an argument put forward that because car engines run more economically at 30mph than 20mph, which at a steady speed is generally correct. However more fuel is used in accelerating to 30 mph than to 20 mph, so in normal use a car will always use more fuel to attain 30mph  between junctionc/traffic lights than levelling off at 20mph.
•    It might take a minute or two longer to complete a short journey across a neighbourhood, but are we so bad at time management that this issue can be a realistic objection to the many benefits of speed reduction?

 

The benefits are 

•    Safer roads, because coming to a dead stop from 20mph happens in approximately 3 car lengths, whereas it takes six car lengths to stop from 30mph
•    A less intimidating environment for cyclists and pedestrians, encouraging sustainable travel.
•    Lowering urban and residential speed limits to 20 mph has been found to decrease child pedestrian accidents by up to 70%(Transport Research Laboratory). In Portsmouth the 20mph limit on all residential roads has reduced casualties by 22%.

 

We realise that there will be costs attached to the introduction of such a policy in terms of signage and awareness raising, but we believe the public investment in controlling a 20mph urban speed limit will be repaid in healthier , happier and safer neighbourhoods .

Regards

James Pocklington